Tranexamic acid versus adrenaline-soaked pledgets for the reduction of intraoperative bleeding in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To examine the impact of locally applied tranexamic acid and adrenaline, separately and in combination, on intraoperative blood loss and surgical field quality during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The study involved 40 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. They were divided into two groups. Group I received adrenaline alone in one side and a mixture of adrenaline and tranexamic acid in the other side. Group II received adrenaline alone in one side and tranexamic acid in the otherside. Parameters like surgery time, blood loss, and surgical field quality were studied. RESULTS: Results: In Group I, the combination of adrenaline and tranexamic acid significantly reduced blood loss and enhanced surgical field quality compared to adrenaline alone. In Group II, adrenaline outperformed tranexamic acid in shortening surgery duration and improving surgical field quality. However, there was no significant difference in blood loss reduction between adrenaline and tranexamic acid. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The study concluded that tranexamic acid is less effective than adrenaline when introduced as topical intranasal pledgets in both decreasing the time needed for the surgery and improving the subjective satisfaction of the surgeon while there is no significant difference regarding decreasing intraoperative blood loss. The mixture of adrenaline and tranexamic acid pledgets are more effective than adrenaline-only pledgets in terms of decreasing the intraoperative blood loss and improving the surgeon's satisfaction with no significant difference regarding the time needed for the surgery.

Therapeutic efficacy of tranexamic acid on traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Tranexamic acid (TXA) demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TXA in patients with TBI. METHODS: The databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, were systematically searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of TXA for TBI from January 2000 to November 2023. RESULTS: The present meta-analysis incorporates ten RCTs. Compared to the placebo group, administration of TXA in patients with TBI resulted in a significant reduction in mortality (P = 0.05), hemorrhage growth (P = 0.03), and volume of hemorrhage growth (P = 0.003). However, no significant impact was observed on neurosurgery outcomes (P = 0.25), seizure occurrence (P = 0.78), or pulmonary embolism incidence (P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: The administration of TXA is significantly associated with reduced mortality and hemorrhage growth in patients suffering from TBI, while the need of neurosurgery, seizures, and incidence of pulmonary embolism remains comparable to that observed with placebo.

Comparison of blood loss between intra-articular microporous polysaccharide hemospheres powder and tranexamic acid following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with substantial blood loss and tranexamic acid (TXA) effectively reduces postoperative bleeding. Although it is known that there is no difference between intravenous or intra-articular (IA) injection, the general interest is directed towards topical hemostatic agents regarding thromboembolic events in high-risk patients. This study aimed to compare the blood conservation effects of IA MPH powder and TXA in patients undergoing primary TKA. We retrospectively analyzed 103 patients who underwent primary TKA between June 2020 and December 2021. MPH powder was applied to the IA space before capsule closure (MPH group, n = 51). TXA (3 g) was injected via the drain after wound closure (TXA group, n = 52). All patients underwent drain clamping for three postoperative hours. The primary outcome was the drain output, and the secondary outcomes were the postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels during the hospitalization period and the perioperative blood transfusion rates. An independent Student's t-test was used to determine differences between the two groups. The drain output in the first 24 h after surgery was significantly higher in the MPH group than in the TXA group. The postoperative Hb levels were significantly lower in the MPH group than in the TXA group. In patients with simultaneous bilateral TKA, there was a significant difference in the blood transfusion volumes and the rates between groups. It is considered that IA MPH powder cannot replace IA TXA because of an inferior efficacy in reducing blood loss and maintaining postoperative Hb levels in the early postoperative period after primary TKA. Moreover, in the case of simultaneous bilateral TKA, we do not recommend the use of IA MPH powder because it was notably less effective in the field of transfusion volume and rate.

Rare bleeding disorders: Advances in management.

Inherited factor coagulation deficiencies and vascular bleeding disorders, associated with bleeding of various severity, are often classified as rare bleeding disorders (RBDs). These include inherited fibrinogen disorders, inherited platelet function disorders (IPFD) and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). In the last decades, there have been large increases in knowledge on the epidemiology, genetics, physiopathology, clinical features, and diagnosis of RBDs, but improvements in management have been more limited and remain challenging. The treatment mainstay of RBDs is based only on replacement of a few available coagulation factor concentrates or cryoprecipitates. There is growing interest in therapeutic agents that enhance coagulation or inhibiting anticoagulant pathways in RBDs. In severe IPFD, the optimal platelet transfusion strategy is not yet established. Moreover, data is scarce on the effectiveness and safety of desmopressin and/or antifibrinolytic drugs often used for milder IPFD treatment. The best fibrinogen replacement strategy (prophylaxis vs. on demand) in afibrinogenemia is still debated. Similarly, the optimal trough fibrinogen target level for treatment of acute bleeding, and the role of fibrinogen replacement during pregnancy in mild hypofibrinogenemia and dysfibrinogenemia, have not been properly evaluated. The therapeutic arsenal in HHT includes antifibrinolytics and a series of antiangiogenic agents whose potential efficacy has been tested in small studies or are under investigation for treatment of bleeding. However, there is need to address several issues, including the optimal dosing strategies, the potential emergent toxicity of longer-term use, and the impact of systemic antiangiogenic treatment on visceral arteriovenous malformations.

Optimised fast-track protocols in total knee arthroplasty determine shorter hospitalisation time and lower perioperative/postoperative complications.

PURPOSE: This literature review aims to present evidence-based clinical recommendations for the eight most debated topics related to perioperative management in total knee arthroplasty: counselling, prehabilitation, transfusion risk, tranexamic acid, drainage, analgesia, urinary catheter and compression stockings. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team conducted a systematic review on these topics. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for the literature review and result presentation. The research encompassed articles from 1 January 2009 to 28 February 2023, retrieved through the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Embase database and Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Forty-five articles were selected. Preoperative counselling has limited evidence for its impact on postoperative outcomes; yet, it can help alleviate surgery-related anxiety and manage postoperative symptoms. Prehabilitation can also prepare patients for surgery, reducing hospital stays and improving postsurgery functionality. Numerous studies suggest that preoperative Hb levels are independently linked to transfusion risk, with a recommended level of 13 g/dL. Combining intravenous and local tranexamic acid administration is strongly advised to reduce perioperative blood loss, while drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty offers no functional advantages. Employing a multimodal analgesia approach yields better results with reduced opioid usage. Indwelling urinary catheters provide no benefit and avoiding them can lower the risk of urinary tract infections. As for compression stockings, there is insufficient evidence in the literature to support their efficacy in preventing venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSION: The best-track protocol has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing hospitalisation time and perioperative/postoperative complications. It is success relies on a collaborative, resource-adaptive approach led by a multidisciplinary team. Both patients and hospitals benefit from this approach, as it enhances care quality and lowers costs. Several studies have highlighted the significance of a patient-centred approach in achieving high-quality care. Creating a novel treatment protocol could be a prospective goal in the near future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Association between tranexamic acid administration and mortality based on the trauma phenotype: a retrospective analysis of a nationwide trauma registry in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In trauma systems, criteria for individualised and optimised administration of tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic, are yet to be established. This study used nationwide cohort data from Japan to evaluate the association between TXA and in-hospital mortality among all patients with blunt trauma based on clinical phenotypes (trauma phenotypes). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) spanning 2019 to 2021. RESULTS: Of 80,463 patients with trauma registered in the JTDB, 53,703 met the inclusion criteria, and 8046 (15.0%) received TXA treatment. The patients were categorised into eight trauma phenotypes. After adjusting with inverse probability treatment weighting, in-hospital mortality of the following trauma phenotypes significantly reduced with TXA administration: trauma phenotype 1 (odds ratio [OR] 0.68 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.81]), trauma phenotype 2 (OR 0.73 [0.66-0.81]), trauma phenotype 6 (OR 0.52 [0.39-0.70]), and trauma phenotype 8 (OR 0.67 [0.60-0.75]). Conversely, trauma phenotypes 3 (OR 2.62 [1.98-3.47]) and 4 (OR 1.39 [1.11-1.74]) exhibited a significant increase in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the association between TXA administration and survival outcomes based on clinical phenotypes. We found an association between trauma phenotypes and in-hospital mortality, indicating that treatment with TXA could potentially influence this relationship. Further studies are needed to assess the usefulness of these phenotypes.

Prophylactic tranexamic acid in Cesarean delivery: an updated meta-analysis with a trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Although several studies on the prophylactic use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery have been published, conflicting results raise questions regarding its use. Thus, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of PPH prophylaxis with TXA. SOURCE: We searched PubMed®, Embase, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic TXA with placebo or no treatment in parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery. Our main outcomes were PPH, any blood transfusion, need for additional uterotonics, and adverse events. We performed a trial sequential analysis (TSA) of all outcomes to investigate the reliability and conclusiveness of findings. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We included 38 RCTs including 22,940 parturients, 11,535 (50%) of whom were randomized to receive prophylactic TXA. Patients treated with TXA had significantly fewer cases of PPH (risk ratio [RR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.69; P < 0.001); less blood transfusion (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.61; P < 0.001), and less use of additional uterotonics (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.68; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of adverse effects and thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic TXA administration for parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery significantly reduced blood loss, without increasing adverse events, supporting its use as a safe and effective strategy for reducing PPH in this population. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023422188); first submitted 27 April 2023.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'hémorragie du post-partum (HPP) est l'une des principales causes de mortalité maternelle dans le monde. Bien que plusieurs études sur l'utilisation prophylactique d'acide tranexamique (TXA) chez les personnes parturientes ayant accouché par césarienne aient été publiées, des résultats contradictoires soulèvent des questions quant à son utilisation. Ainsi, nous avons cherché à étudier l'innocuité et l'efficacité de la prophylaxie à base de TXA pour l'HPP. SOURCES: Nous avons fait une recherche sur PubMed®, Embase, Cochrane Central et ClinicalTrials.gov pour en tirer les études randomisées contrôlées (ERC) comparant le TXA prophylactique à un placebo ou à l'absence de traitement chez les personnes parturientes accouchant par césarienne. Nos principaux critères d'évaluation étaient l'HPP, toute transfusion sanguine, la nécessité d'un utérotonique supplémentaire et les événements indésirables. Nous avons effectué une analyse séquentielle des études pour tous les résultats afin d'examiner la fiabilité et le caractère concluant des conclusions. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Nous avons inclus 38 ERC comprenant 22 940 personnes parturientes, dont 11 535 (50 %) ont été randomisées pour recevoir du TXA prophylactique. La patientèle traitée par TXA présentait significativement moins de cas d'HPP (risque relatif [RR], 0,51; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,38 à 0,69; P < 0,001); moins de transfusion sanguine (RR, 0,43; IC 95 %, 0,30 à 0,61; P < 0,001) et moins d'utilisation d'utérotoniques supplémentaires (RR, 0,52; IC 95 %, 0,40 à 0,68; P < 0,001). Aucune différence significative n'a été constatée entre les groupes en termes d'effets indésirables et d'événements thromboemboliques. CONCLUSION: L'administration prophylactique de TXA pour les personnes parturientes accouchant par césarienne a considérablement réduit les pertes de sang sans augmenter les événements indésirables, ce qui soutient son utilisation comme stratégie sécuritaire et efficace pour réduire l'HPP dans cette population. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42023422188); première soumission le 27 avril 2023.

Dosing of tranexamic acid in trauma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Tranexamic acid is routinely used as part of the management of traumatic bleeding. The dose recommendation in trauma was extrapolated from other clinical settings and the results of pragmatic randomized trials rather than pharmaco-kinetic and -dynamic evaluations. The review addresses current evidence on dosing of tranexamic acid in traumatized patients with a focus on efficacy, safety and risk-benefit profile. RECENT FINDINGS: A majority, but not all, of existing randomized clinical trials reports a reduction in mortality and/or blood loss with tranexamic acid administration. Increasing dose above the general recommendation (1 g bolus + 1 g infusion/8 h intravenously) has not been shown to further increase efficacy and could potentially increase side effects. SUMMARY: The benefit of tranexamic acid as adjuvant therapy in the management of bleeding trauma patients on mortality and transfusion requirements is clear and well documented, being most effective if given early and to patients with clinical signs of hemorrhagic shock. Recent reports suggest that in some patients presenting with a shutdown of their fibrinolytic pathway the administration of tranexamic acid could be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events and poor outcomes. A more personalized approach based on bedside assessment of fibrinolytic activation and pharmacokinetic-based dose regimen should be developed moving forward.

Impact of intraosseous regional administration of tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty on perioperative blood loss: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical intervention to treat joint diseases. However, TKA is associated with significant blood loss. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been used to reduce perioperative bleeding and postoperative blood transfusion. This study aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of intraosseous regional administration (IORA) of TXA in TKA and compare differences in perioperative blood loss between IORA of TXA, intravenous infusion of TXA, and combined IORA and intravenous infusion of TXA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled trial will enrol 105 patients with osteoarthritis who meet the inclusion criteria for unilateral TKA. Patients were randomly divided into three groups using the random number table method. Group A received 1.0 g of TXA via IORA, group B received 1.0 g of TXA via intravenous infusion 15 min prior to the tourniquet release, and group C received both IORA of 1.0 g of TXA and intravenous infusion of 1.0 g of TXA. The primary outcome measure is perioperative total blood loss. Secondary outcomes include bleeding events, venous thromboembolism events, inflammation reactions, other complications and knee function assessments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Informed consent will be obtained from all the patients before enrolment. The trial will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and social media platforms. The findings will provide valuable insights into the use of IORA of TXA in TKA and may lead to the development of new strategies for perioperative blood management in joint replacement surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (approval number: K2371); Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (trial registration number: ChiCTR2200066293).

The effect of ε-aminocaproic acid on blood product requirement, outcome and thromboelastography parameters in severely thrombocytopenic dogs.

BACKGROUND: No treatment other than platelet administration is known to protect against spontaneous hemorrhage in thrombocytopenic dogs. OBJECTIVES: Primary: determine if treatment with ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) decreases the requirement for blood transfusions and improves outcome in dogs with severe thrombocytopenia. Secondary: find evidence of hyperfibrinolysis and determine the effect EACA administration on rapid (rTEG) and tissue plasminogen activator-spiked (tPA-rTEG) thromboelastography parameters. ANIMALS: Twenty-seven dogs with severe thrombocytopenia were treated with EACA, and data from an additional 33 were obtained from the hospital database as historical control (HC) cohort. METHODS: Single arm clinical trial with HCs. The EACA group dogs received EACA (100 mg/kg IV followed by a constant-rate infusion [CRI] of 400 mg/kg/24 hours). Thromboelastography before and during EACA infusion, hospitalization days, number of transfusions, and mortality were compared. RESULTS: No difference was found in number of transfusions per dog (median, interquartile range; 1, 0-2.5 vs 0.9, 0-2; P = .5) and hospitalization days (4, 4-6 vs 4.5, 3.75-6; P = .83) between HC and EACA groups, respectively, and no difference in survival was identified by log-rank analysis (P = .15). Maximum amplitude on both rTEG and tPA-rTEG increased after EACA administration (rTEG baseline: 23.6, 9.6-38.9; post-EACA: 27.3, 19.8-43.2; P < .001; tPA-rTEG baseline: 23, 10.9-37.2; post-EACA: 24.7, 16.7-44.8; P < .002). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Although EACA increased clot strength, there was no effect on outcome. Treatment with EACA at this dosage cannot be recommended as a routine treatment but may be considered for dogs with severe ongoing hemorrhage.

Prophylactic tranexamic acid for reducing intraoperative blood loss during cesarean section in women at high risk of postpartum hemorrhage: A double-blind placebo randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage remains a leading cause of maternal mortality especially in developing countries. The majority of previous trials on the effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss were performed in low-risk women for postpartum hemorrhage. A recent Cochrane Systematic Review recommended that further research was needed to determine the effects of prophylactic tranexamic acid for preventing intraoperative blood loss in women at high risk of postpartum hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid in reducing intraoperative blood loss when given prior to cesarean delivery in women at high risk of postpartum hemorrhage. STUDY DESIGN: The study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The study consisted of 200 term pregnant women and high-risk preterm pregnancies scheduled for lower-segment cesarean delivery at Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Teaching Hospital, Parklane, Enugu, Nigeria. The participants were randomized into two arms (intravenous 1 g of tranexamic acid or placebo) in a ratio of 1:1. The participants received either 1 g of tranexamic acid or placebo (20 mL of normal saline) intravenously at least 10 min prior to commencement of the surgery. The primary outcome measures were the mean intraoperative blood loss and hematocrit change 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS: The baseline sociodemographic characteristics were similar in both groups. The tranexamic acid group when compared to the placebo group showed significantly lower mean blood loss (442.94 ± 200.97 versus 801.28 ± 258.68 mL; p = 0.001), higher mean postoperative hemoglobin (10.39 + 0.96 versus 9.67 ± 0.86 g/dL; p = 0.001), lower incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (1.0% versus 19.0%; p = 0.001), and lower need for use of additional uterotonic agents after routine management of the third stage of labor (39.0% versus 68.0%; p = 0.001), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the mean preoperative hemoglobin (11.24 ± 0.88 versus 11.15 ± 0.90 g/dL; p = 0.457), need for other surgical intervention for postpartum hemorrhage (p > 0.05), and reported side effect, respectively, between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid significantly decreases postpartum blood loss, improves postpartum hemoglobin, decreases the need for additional uterotonics, and prevents postpartum hemorrhage following cesarean section in pregnant women at high risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Its routine use during cesarean section in high-risk women may be encouraged.The trial was registered in the Pan-African Clinical Trial Registry with approval number PACTR202107872851363.

Evaluating tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of obstetric hemorrhage.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising pharmacological adjunct to treat and prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). We provide an overview of TXA, including its pharmacology, key findings of randomized trials and observational studies, and critical patient safety information. RECENT FINDINGS: Pharmacokinetic data indicate that TXA infusions result in peak plasma concentration within 3 min (range: 1-6.6 min). Ex-vivo pharmacodynamic data suggest that low-dose TXA (5 mg/kg) inhibits maximum lysis for at least 1 h. In predominantly developing countries, TXA has demonstrated a 19% reduction in the risk of bleeding-related death among patients with PPH. Based on high-quality randomized trials, TXA prophylaxis does not effectively reduce the risk of PPH during vaginal delivery and is likely ineffective in reducing the PPH risk during cesarean delivery. TXA exposure does not increase the risk of maternal thrombotic events. Maternal deaths have occurred from accidental intrathecal TXA injection from look-alike medication errors. SUMMARY: TXA has shown promise as an important adjunct for PPH treatment, especially in low-resource settings. However, TXA is not recommended as PPH prophylaxis during vaginal or cesarean delivery. Patient safety initiatives should be prioritized to prevent maternal death from accidental intrathecal TXA injection.

Effect of tranexamic acid on shoulder surgery: an updated meta-analysis of randomized studies.

BACKGROUND: The effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to be effective in reducing blood loss in lower limb arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of TXA in shoulder surgery with the updated studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of all the randomized controlled trials were conducted. We compared the outcomes of patients with and without TXA. The PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies, enrolling 1131 patients, were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Our results revealed that TXA was associated with a significant reduction in total volume blood loss (mean difference [MD]: -112.97, P = .0006), drain output (MD: -81.90, P < .00001), hemoglobin changes (MD: -0.55, P = .02), shorter operative time (MD: -6.19, P = .01), and lower risk of hematoma formation (odds ratio: -0.20, P = .01). The postoperative visual analog scale pain score was also significantly better in the TXA group (MD: -0.78, P < .00001). No significant difference was detected in length of hospital stay and incidence of thromboembolization. CONCLUSION: The usage of TXA in shoulder surgery appeared to be safe and effective in reducing blood loss without any significant complication.

The effect of intravenous tranexamic acid on visual clarity in arthroscopic shoulder surgery compared to epinephrine and a placebo: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The addition of epinephrine in irrigation fluid and the intravenous or local administration of tranexamic acid have independently been reported to decrease bleeding, thereby improving surgeons' visualization during arthroscopic shoulder procedures. No study has compared the effect of intravenous tranexamic acid, epinephrine in the irrigation fluid, or the combination of both tranexamic acid and epinephrine on visual clarity during shoulder arthroscopy with a placebo group. We hypothesized that intravenous tranexamic acid is more effective than epinephrine mixed in the irrigation fluid in improving visualization during shoulder arthroscopy, with no additive effect when both are used. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were randomized into one of 4 study arms: (1) saline irrigation fluid (placebo); (2) epinephrine (0.33 mL of 1:1000 per liter) mixed in irrigation fluid (EPI); (3) 1 g intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA); and (4) epinephrine and tranexamic acid combined (TXA + EPI). Visualization was rated intraoperatively on a scale from 0, indicating poor clarity, to 3, indicating excellent clarity, every 15 minutes and overall. The primary outcome measure was the overall rating of visualization. A stepwise linear regression was performed using visualization as the dependent variable and independent variables including presence or absence of epinephrine and tranexamic acid, surgery duration, complexity, mean arterial pressure, increase in pump pressure, and volume of irrigation fluid. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight patients (mean age 56 years) were randomized. Mean visual clarity for the placebo, TXA, EPI, and TXA + EPI groups were 2.0 (±0.6), 2.0 (±0.6), 2.6 (±0.5), and 2.7 (±0.5), respectively (P < .001). The presence or absence of epinephrine was the most significant predictor of visual clarity (P < .001). Tranexamic acid presence or absence had no effect. No adverse events were recorded in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous tranexamic acid is not an effective alternative to epinephrine in irrigation fluid to improve visualization during routine arthroscopic shoulder surgeries, and there is no additive effect when both are used.